As we age, our cells accumulate DNA damage, which beyond a certain threshold cannot be repaired. (Photograph: Dimitri Otis/Getty Images)

As we age, our cells accumulate DNA damage, which beyond a certain threshold cannot be repaired. (Photograph: Dimitri Otis/Getty Images)

Purging retired cells from the body has been shown to undo the ravages of old age in a study that raises the prospect of new life-extending treatments.

When mice were treated with a substance designed to sweep away cells that have entered a dormant state due to DNA damage their fur regrew, kidney function improved and they were able to run twice as far as untreated elderly animals.

The team are now assessing whether the mice also live longer and are planning a series of safety studies in humans with the ultimate goal of testing whether getting rid of so-called senescent cells could help reverse a range of age-related disorders.

The discovery adds to a wave of new findings hinting at the possibility of a future in which doctors can treat ageing itself, rather than trying to combat the host of diseases that come along with it.

Such a scenario is now supported by science, according to Peter de Keizer, the 36-year-old scientist who led the latest work at Erasmus University Medical Center in the Netherlands. “Maybe when you get to 65 you’ll go every five years for your anti-senescence shot in the clinic. You’ll go for your rejuvenation shot,” he said. “That I can envision when we reach that age.”

As we age, our cells accumulate DNA damage, which beyond a certain threshold cannot be repaired. At this point, cells can either turn cancerous, self-destruct, or enter a semi-dormant state, called senescence. Initially senescent cells were thought to be neutral bystanders that no longer make a useful biological contribution but that are harmless.

However, about a decade ago, this picture began to change.

“It was found that these senescent cells secrete a whole load of junk and they’re not just bystanders but have a negative effect,” said De Keizer. He compares the cells to the toxic presence of a disruptive student in the classroom who drags down the performance of their neighbours.

Click here to continue reading…

SOURCE: Hannah Devlin 
The Guardian